No person’s excellent. That’s why authors want editors. Previous to publication, to restrict the prospect of a newspaper or journal being sued for defamation or meting out false data, editors are imagined to rigorously learn every story. For security’s sake, if the author advocates one thing that units off alarm bells – or on the floor seems plain nuts – that data must be questioned and vetted.
However sadly, editors aren’t excellent both, and typically issues fall between the cracks, as these two examples of revered publications meting out dangerously inaccurate recommendation present.