On the subject of film sequels, the simple route is to easily tag a quantity on the top of the identify, whether or not it is Iron Man 2 or Noticed VII. However when studios and writers try to get inventive with the titles, that is typically the place they have a tendency to fail.
Sadly, as a substitute of enjoying it secure with numbers and even generic subtitles, these sequels bought slightly too indulgent. Between misspelled phrases, full sentences, and changing phrases with numbers, Redditors bought second-hand embarrassment from these film sequel titles. And typically they even spoiled the film.
Batman V Superman: Daybreak Of Justice (2016)
- 1 Batman V Superman: Daybreak Of Justice (2016)
- 2 Star Wars: The Phantom Menace (1999)
- 3 Terminator Genisys (2015)
- 4 Daybreak Of The Planet Of The Apes (2014)
- 5 Star Wars: The Final Jedi (2017)
- 6 Star Trek Into Darkness (2013)
- 7 No Time To Die (2021)
- 8 The Lion King 1½ (2004)
- 9 Troll 2 (1990)
- 10 2 Quick 2 Livid (2003)
If the title seems unusual, it is as a result of there needs to be a “vs.” as a substitute of a “v,” and Ghostdog2041 places it greatest by explaining that “the ‘v’ is how lawsuits are written, not grudge matches.” Whereas there’s a scene the place Superman finds himself in court docket, that wasn’t precisely how the 2 superheroes settled their feud.
There’s additionally an argument to be made that whereas the “v” is an issue, the movie’s subtitle is even worse. Daybreak of Justice completely defeats the aim of a film about Batman and Superman’s feud. The subtitle already spoils the truth that they will put aside their variations and kind the Justice League collectively.
Star Wars: The Phantom Menace (1999)
23 years because it was first launched, audiences are nonetheless debating Star Wars: The Phantom Menace to at the present time. The film was sluggish and meandering for some, however Phantom Menance was additionally stuffed with nice motion scenes. After the polarizing film ended, no matter whether or not audiences thought it was good or unhealthy, they have been unanimously left questioning the place the mysterious “phantom” was.
With reference to “the phantom menace,” a now-deleted Reddit person rhetorically asks, “What was it?” The place the earlier Star Wars motion pictures had such succinct and to-the-point subtitles, comparable to A New Hope and The Empire Strikes Again, the 1999 film’s title left even the largest followers confused.
Terminator Genisys (2015)
The Terminator motion pictures have arguably turn into more and more meaningless and questionable with every consecutive launch. Many followers believed that it will have been laborious for a Terminator title to worsen than the run-of-the-mill-sounding Terminator: Salvation, however that is precisely what the franchise achieved with Terminator Genisys.
The film managed to each be a generic title in addition to inexplicably and deliberately misspell a phrase, and Siggeplump believes the studio made that call as a result of it thought, “it seems cool, possibly.” The follow-up film, Terminator: Darkish Destiny, had a simply as generic title, however not less than it did not misspell “destiny” to be quirky.
Daybreak Of The Planet Of The Apes (2014)
Any one of many seven Planet of the Apes sequels could possibly be in competition for the worst sequel title ever, as they’re extra like full sentences as a substitute of film names. However TheLimeyLemon votes for Daybreak Of The Planet of the Apes because the worst of the lot, and it is not simply due to the exhausting use of “of the.”
The Redditor explains that “‘Daybreak’ is a bit redundant when the apes have already risen.” The person is referring to the truth that the film is following 2011’s Rise of the Planet of the Apes, and, on this context, the 2 verbs basically imply the identical factor. Whereas Daybreak is likely one of the greatest film remakes of the 2000s, the identify would not make all that a lot sense.
Star Wars: The Final Jedi (2017)
There is no secret that Final Jedi is a massively polarizing blockbuster, and even its title has brought on a fuss. DarkWizardPluto is essentially the most essential of the identify, asking, “who titles their second film in a trilogy with ‘Final’ because the adjective?”
Nonetheless, whereas some audiences won’t have observed, The Final Jedi cleverly connects with its predecessor’s title to kind a full sentence, which additionally explains the films’ plots. When coupled with the title of the earlier film, it states, “the power awakens the final Jedi.” Sadly, the studio additionally shot itself within the foot by doing that, because the third film, Rise of Skywalker, would not observe that sample.
Star Trek Into Darkness (2013)
GnRgr2 is essential of the second film within the Star Trek reboot collection, Star Trek Into Darkness, and so they posit that “Utilizing ‘trek’ as a verb is despicable.” However in comparison with different film sequels, it is a intelligent technique to have a subtitle with out truly having a subtitle.
In a panorama that is stuffed with meaningless and generic subtitles, comparable to Revelations or Retribution, Abrams eradicated that in a singular manner. Nonetheless, the title does fail in a single main space, which is that there is not truly something remotely darkish in regards to the sequel.
No Time To Die (2021)
Except Quantum of Solace, all of Daniel Craig’s Bond film titles have been tied to the plot ultimately. Skyfall associated to the place Bond grew up and Spectre was the identify of the secret society led by Blofeld. However No Time To Die ended that sample.
Davel23 makes an commentary that the title “appears like one thing a random Bond film title generator would spit out.” There’s even a cringey second within the movie when a personality says the film’s title out loud earlier than killing somebody. However, on the similar time, it is a fantastic nod to the goofier Roger Moore-led entries within the franchise.
The Lion King 1½ (2004)
The place the Jackass motion pictures launch .5 variations of every film, which characteristic alternate takes, Disney used “½” in its title to inform a narrative that takes place similtaneously the unique The Lion King. Paperd criticizes the title not due to how unhealthy it’s, however due to the significantly better prospects at hand.
The Redditor explains that, as “the plot was basically Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Useless, it will have been nice if they might have known as it Timon and Pumba are Useless.” Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are characters in Hamlet, and the 1990 film follows the 2 angels as they touch upon the occasions of the Shakespearean tragedy, and that is precisely what occurs in The Lion King 1½.
Troll 2 (1990)
Although Troll 2 was launched in 1990, it was within the mid-2000s when it began to realize consideration, because it was the topic of the acclaimed documentary, Finest Worst Film. The documentary went into nice element about what occurred behind the scenes of Troll 2, such because the actors having to purchase their very own outfits and the star of the movie being a dentist.
However most attention-grabbing of all is that it was by no means meant to be a Troll sequel. Curiously, the monsters within the film are goblins, not trolls, and as AstonVanilla factors out, the film “has nothing to do with Troll.”
2 Quick 2 Livid (2003)
The historical past of the Quick & Livid franchise’s film titles are virtually as entertaining and ridiculous as the films themselves. The fourth film brought on a lot confusion, because it was merely titled Quick & Livid, and the latest film barely even bothered with a title, because the studio went with F9.
However the outrageousness of the titles started with the very first sequel, 2 Quick 2 Livid, which TBatWork explains is a “ridiculous precedent that solely works for the sequel.” Nonetheless, it will have been a courageous transfer if Common determined to go along with 3 Quick 3 Livid as a substitute of Tokyo Drift.
NEXT: Quick & Livid – 10 Behind The Scenes Info About 2 Quick 2 Livid
Tom Holland Is Now Marvel’s Largest Star